![]() |
Maxie in Monroe, June 2010 |
So who am I to argue with their training/trialing techniques. I wouldn't dare, except I don't like the results I am seeing in their performances. By the time you get to Excellent, you can't Q if you make a single mistake. By the time you get to Masters, you have to double Q every day for it to count (once in Standard and once in Jumpers), that means no mistakes all day. Our competitors are rarely achieving that.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427a7/427a7a17cbc8523078a46e10024fbf1f52ef02ea" alt=""
go to PLACE,
go to WIN!
Of course, once you've flubbed up a run, it immediately becomes a training session. An EXPENSIVE training session. Of course, you finish the run. If you've taken videos, you can analyze what went wrong, what you need to work on, learn what judges call a "wrong course", a "refusal", a "time fault", an "elimination". All valuable information. All I'm saying is, I won't go to trials until I feel I have a very decent chance of not flubbing up. Sounds like common sense, but there are a lot of competitors eating up ring time with poorly trained dogs where it would take a long string of miracles for them to Q. And you'll hear them say, "We are just here for the experience". Earning titles is not their priority, they say . . . . . but they are completely beside themselves if they earn one!!!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment